Skip to content
Journal

Culture

The Consolidation Wave and the Independent Studio

Headshot of Daniel Okafor
Daniel Okafor
September 5, 2024 · 3 min read

The agency industry is consolidating at a pace we have not seen in years. Holding companies keep folding storied agency brands into each other, trading heritage names for combined capabilities and cleaner org charts. Private equity is rolling up mid-size shops into platforms. Consultancies continue absorbing creative firms into their transformation practices. Every quarter brings another round of mergers, restructures, and eulogies for agencies whose names used to mean something specific.

The strategic logic is real, and it would be lazy to pretend otherwise. Global clients want fewer contracts, integrated data and media and production, and pricing leverage that only scale provides. If you are running a holding company, consolidation is not a panic move. It is the rational response to procurement departments and to a technology shift that rewards owning the whole stack.

But we run a fifty-person independent studio, so the more interesting question for us, and for the clients who hire firms like ours, is what consolidation does to the rest of the market. Our answer: it is quietly creating the best conditions for independents in a decade.

What merging actually costs

Every merger announcement leads with capabilities and ends with synergies, and both words obscure the same reality: for eighteen months, the merged agency's best people are working on the merger. Reorgs, retention negotiations, systems integration, the diplomatic assignment of which CCO survives. Client work does not stop, but the organization's attention divides, and attention is the only thing an agency actually sells.

The people costs are more visible. Post-merger departures are so predictable that we now track them the way recruiters do. Senior talent that spent years inside a specific culture wakes up inside an acronym, does the math on their place in the new structure, and calls someone like us. Two of our best hires this year came from exactly this pipeline, and we are not a large firm. Multiply that across every independent in the country.

The gap in the middle

Consolidation optimizes for the largest clients, and the optimization is real: if you need forty markets, integrated media buying, and a single global contract, holding companies earn their scale. But that machinery has a minimum efficient scale for clients too. Brands below it increasingly report the experience of being staffed by the B team, priced by the A team's rate card.

That gap in the middle, ambitious brands with seven-figure rather than nine-figure budgets, is where independents live. What those clients want has not changed: senior people in the room, work that does not smell like a template, and accountability you can name in one phone call. Consolidation makes those things scarcer inside the large firms and therefore more valuable outside them.

What independence obligates us to do

Being small is not a strategy, it is a constraint. The strategy is what you do with it, and we hold ourselves to a short list:

  • Stay senior. Our ratio of makers to managers is the whole pitch. The day a client meets people who do not touch the work, we have become a small holding company, which is the worst of both worlds.
  • Choose depth over coverage. We will never offer everything. We partner openly for what we do not do, and we would rather say "not us" than deliver mediocrity with confidence.
  • Keep the balance sheet boring. Independence is only real if you can decline bad revenue. Debt and outside capital have a way of choosing your clients for you.

The long view

Industry consolidation runs in cycles, and every wave of mergers eventually sheds a generation of founders who start the next wave of interesting independent shops. We know because we were part of one such generation. The names on the buildings change; the underlying market truth does not: clients buy talent, judgment, and care, and none of those scale as smoothly as a press release implies.

So no eulogies from us. The giants are doing what giants must. We would just gently note, to any brand reading the merger coverage with a furrowed brow: the people who used to make that agency great are answering the phone somewhere smaller now.

Building something this could apply to?

We take on a small number of flagship projects each quarter.

Start a project