Skip to content
Journal

Culture

The Year We Stop Confusing Speed with Progress

Headshot of Kate Morrison
Kate Morrison
January 7, 2025 · 2 min read

Every January the studio does the same thing. We close the doors for a day, order too much food, and argue about what we believe. Not goals, not revenue targets. Beliefs. Because the work follows the beliefs, and if the beliefs drift, the work drifts with them.

This year the argument took about four minutes to find its center: speed.

2024 was the year everything got faster. Decks got faster. First drafts got faster. Storyboards, code scaffolds, campaign variants, all of it compressed from days to minutes. And walking into 2025, the honest question is not whether we use these tools. We do, daily. The question is whether faster made anything better. Looking at the industry at large, I would say mostly no. Feeds are fuller. Averages are lower. The middle of the market has never been more crowded or more forgettable.

Speed is a feature of the process, not a virtue of the work

Here is the trap we watched teams fall into last year: the first draft arrives so quickly that it starts to feel like the final draft. The tool hands you something plausible, and plausible is seductive. You spend your energy editing toward acceptable instead of pushing toward remarkable.

We felt the pull ourselves. On one identity project last fall, we caught the team polishing a direction that nobody actually loved, simply because it existed and the deadline was near. We threw it out. The final work, the thing the client actually shipped, came from a sketch made with a marker on a Wednesday afternoon. The tools helped us execute it beautifully. They did not find it for us.

What we are holding ourselves to

We wrote these down and taped them to the wall by the kitchen, which is the only place anyone reads anything:

  • The idea gets protected time. No generation, no scaffolding, no acceleration until a human has a point of view worth accelerating.
  • Taste is a hiring criterion, not a department. Everyone here, engineers included, is expected to know good from good enough.
  • We show clients fewer things. Three strong directions beat nine plausible ones. Volume is now free, which means volume is now worthless.
  • Craft time is budgeted, not stolen. The last ten percent of polish is where the work becomes ours. It goes on the schedule like anything else.

The opportunity hiding in the flood

I am genuinely optimistic, and not in the vague keynote way. When everyone can produce competent work instantly, competent stops being a differentiator. The premium moves to judgment, to conviction, to the things that are hard to prompt for: restraint, timing, a joke that actually lands, a grid that breathes.

Clients feel this even when they cannot name it. The briefs coming into the studio this month are noticeably different from a year ago. Less "we need more content" and more "we need to matter." That is a brief we know how to answer.

So that is our January belief, argued over and settled: speed is table stakes. Progress is the work getting better. We intend to spend 2025 proving there is a difference, and we intend to enjoy it. See you out there.

Building something this could apply to?

We take on a small number of flagship projects each quarter.

Start a project